FolioStart free
All scales

Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale

DERS-36
psychologyhealth sciencesFree for research use

Permission: Free for research use. Free for non-commercial academic research, with no license fee. Cite the original publication.

A 36-item measure of perceived difficulties across six dimensions of emotion regulation.

Items
36
Response format
5-point frequency scale
Version
Original 36-item DERS
Subscales
6

Ready-to-cite methods sentence

Emotion-regulation difficulties were measured with the 36-item Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS-36; Gratz & Roemer, 2004), whose original total score showed high internal consistency (α = .93).

Citing this in a methods section? This scale spans more than one discipline, so the style depends on where you publish. See the APA 7 or Vancouver guides, or compare all six citation styles.

Run DERS-36 in Folio Surveyor

Folio has verified the citation and methods for this scale, not its item wording, so Surveyor cannot add the items for you. It starts a study named for DERS-36, with room for its 36 items; you add each item from the published source.

Start a study
Save DERS-36 Cite DERS-36 in a new doc

Reliability & validation

Notes
Every original subscale had Cronbach's alpha of .80 or higher (.80 to .89; Gratz & Roemer, 2004).
Validation population
Undergraduate validation samples (Gratz & Roemer, 2004)
Test–retest
0.88
Cronbach's α
0.93

Subscales

Nonacceptance of Emotional ResponsesDifficulties Engaging in Goal-Directed BehaviorImpulse Control DifficultiesLack of Emotional AwarenessLimited Access to Emotion Regulation StrategiesLack of Emotional Clarity

Response anchors

Almost never (0-10%) · Sometimes (11-35%) · About half the time (36-65%) · Most of the time (66-90%) · Almost always (91-100%)

Known limitations

Later studies have questioned the fit of the original six-factor model, especially the Awareness subscale. Higher scores indicate greater perceived difficulty, not a clinical diagnosis. Confirm reproduction terms before administration.

Original citation

Gratz, K. L., & Roemer, L. (2004). Multidimensional assessment of emotion regulation and dysregulation: Development, factor structure, and initial validation of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 26(1), 41-54.

https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOBA.0000007455.08539.94

Questions researchers ask

What does the DERS-36 measure?

A 36-item measure of perceived difficulties across six dimensions of emotion regulation.

How many items does the DERS-36 have?

The Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS-36) has 36 items across 6 subscales: Nonacceptance of Emotional Responses, Difficulties Engaging in Goal-Directed Behavior, Impulse Control Difficulties, Lack of Emotional Awareness, Limited Access to Emotion Regulation Strategies, Lack of Emotional Clarity.

Is the DERS-36 free to use?

The DERS-36 is free to use for non-commercial academic research. You don't need to pay a license fee, but you should always cite the original publication.

Is the DERS-36 reliable?

Validation studies report Cronbach's α of 0.93, test–retest reliability of 0.88. See the reliability section for the population studied and full statistics.

Who developed the DERS-36, and how do I cite it?

Gratz, K. L., & Roemer, L. (2004). Multidimensional assessment of emotion regulation and dysregulation: Development, factor structure, and initial validation of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 26(1), 41-54. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOBA.0000007455.08539.94

Or track new research mentioning DERS-36 as it publishes

Related scales

ERQEmotion Regulation QuestionnaireSDQStrengths and Difficulties QuestionnairePCSPain Catastrophizing ScalePSS-10Perceived Stress ScaleSCSSelf-Compassion ScaleWEMWBSWarwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale

Library entry verified September 2026. Metadata is provided for reference. Questionnaires are built in Folio Surveyor, subject to each instrument's licensing, and can be taken to Qualtrics, Google Forms or Microsoft Forms, with their CSV responses brought back for scoring.